🔗 Share this article

Thhese times present a quite distinctive occurrence: the inaugural US procession of the caretakers. They vary in their skills and attributes, but they all share the identical objective – to avert an Israeli infringement, or even devastation, of the fragile truce. Since the conflict concluded, there have been rare occasions without at least one of Donald Trump’s delegates on the ground. Only recently saw the presence of a senior advisor, Steve Witkoff, JD Vance and Marco Rubio – all coming to carry out their roles.

Israel engages them fully. In just a few days it launched a set of attacks in the region after the loss of two Israeli military soldiers – resulting, as reported, in dozens of local casualties. Several ministers demanded a restart of the war, and the Israeli parliament passed a early decision to incorporate the occupied territories. The US response was somewhere between “no” and “hell no.”

However in various respects, the Trump administration seems more concentrated on preserving the present, uneasy phase of the peace than on advancing to the subsequent: the rehabilitation of Gaza. When it comes to this, it seems the United States may have aspirations but little tangible plans.

Currently, it remains unknown when the planned multinational oversight committee will actually assume control, and the identical goes for the appointed military contingent – or even the composition of its members. On Tuesday, Vance said the US would not impose the membership of the international unit on Israel. But if Benjamin Netanyahu’s government continues to reject multiple options – as it did with the Ankara's proposal recently – what happens then? There is also the reverse point: which party will establish whether the units preferred by the Israelis are even interested in the mission?

The question of how long it will require to disarm Hamas is equally unclear. “The expectation in the leadership is that the multinational troops is going to at this point assume responsibility in neutralizing the organization,” said the official lately. “That’s going to take a while.” The former president further highlighted the ambiguity, stating in an conversation on Sunday that there is no “hard” timeline for the group to demilitarize. So, in theory, the unnamed participants of this not yet established global force could deploy to Gaza while Hamas members still hold power. Would they be confronting a administration or a guerrilla movement? Among the many of the issues arising. Some might ask what the verdict will be for everyday civilians as things stand, with Hamas continuing to attack its own political rivals and critics.

Current events have afresh highlighted the omissions of local media coverage on each side of the Gaza boundary. Every publication attempts to scrutinize every possible angle of the group's violations of the peace. And, typically, the fact that Hamas has been hindering the return of the bodies of killed Israeli hostages has dominated the headlines.

By contrast, attention of civilian deaths in Gaza stemming from Israeli attacks has obtained little attention – or none. Take the Israeli counter strikes after a recent Rafah event, in which a pair of military personnel were killed. While local officials stated 44 deaths, Israeli media pundits complained about the “limited reaction,” which targeted only infrastructure.

This is nothing new. Over the past weekend, the media office accused Israel of breaking the peace with Hamas 47 times since the truce began, resulting in the loss of 38 individuals and harming another many more. The claim seemed irrelevant to the majority of Israeli reporting – it was simply absent. This applied to information that 11 members of a local family were killed by Israeli soldiers a few days ago.

The civil defence agency reported the family had been trying to go back to their home in the Zeitoun neighbourhood of the city when the bus they were in was attacked for allegedly going over the “boundary” that marks territories under Israeli army control. That boundary is invisible to the naked eye and appears only on plans and in government papers – not always obtainable to ordinary residents in the area.

Even that event barely rated a reference in Israeli media. One source mentioned it in passing on its online platform, quoting an IDF official who explained that after a suspicious vehicle was detected, forces fired warning shots towards it, “but the transport persisted to approach the soldiers in a fashion that posed an direct risk to them. The troops shot to eliminate the risk, in compliance with the truce.” No fatalities were claimed.

Amid such narrative, it is no surprise a lot of Israelis feel Hamas solely is to at fault for violating the truce. This perception risks encouraging demands for a stronger approach in Gaza.

At some point – perhaps sooner rather than later – it will no longer be sufficient for US envoys to take on the role of kindergarten teachers, telling the Israeli government what to refrain from. They will {have to|need